Once human rights impacts and risks are identified, an FI should take action. Where it is necessary to prioritise actions to address actual and potential adverse human rights impacts, FIs should first seek to prevent and mitigate those that are most severe or where delayed response would make them irremediable. Identifying these salient human rights issues is meaningful within the framework of the UNGPs as long as it leads to concrete actions to address them.
The type of action will depend on how the FI is involved with the human rights impacts – namely, through a) causing adverse impacts, b) contributing to adverse impacts caused with or through another entity; or c) being directly linked to adverse impacts through business relationships. The appropriate action will vary according to the extent of an FIs leverage in addressing the adverse impact. The concepts of cause, contribute, or directly link are also discussed in greater detail in the section on ‘Remedy‘.
For all identified risks, the following considerations can serve as a guide for identifying and developing appropriate measures:
| Question | Indicative examples |
|
Are risks adequately addressed by policies, processes, and systems? If not, do policies and systems need to updated or developed? (See also section on ‘Policy commitments and human rights‘) |
This can involve considering the existence (or development) of the following policies or frameworks:
|
|
Have relevant stakeholders been engaged – in terms of both developing policies / mitigants and raising awareness of human rights risks? (See also section on ‘Policy commitments and human rights‘) |
Engagement may entail both internal or external stakeholders:
|
|
Have monitoring or reporting frameworks been developed which can provide a basis for understanding the effectiveness of mitigation measures? (See also section on ‘Monitoring‘) |
Monitoring or reporting approaches might entail:
|
|
Have measures been taken to promote a culture of human rights respect in the business enterprise? |
Measures are potentially varied, but can include:
|
Promoting internal awareness of human rights commitments and risks is crucial to ensuring uptake and implementation. Engagement efforts can focus on the bank’s own human resources and client facing employees, including through training and knowledge sessions. Outreach to third parties (e.g. contractors, suppliers, commercial partners, civil society organisations) may also be necessary to ensure that human rights expectations are fully understood and implemented.
| Audience | Opportunities for engagement and awareness raising |
|
Own workforce / human resources |
|
|
Consumer banking customers |
|
|
Contracted workforce Service providers Goods / materials supply chain Commercial partners |
|
Further reading
- United Nations Global Compact Designing Effective Human Rights Training Aligned with the Corporate Responsibility to Respect in the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human RightsGuidance outlining opportunities, challenges, and methods which can be used to deliver company human rights training aligned with international good practice
Where possible, an FI’s human rights policies and commitments should be supported by binding legal requirements. The nature of contractual requirements will differ based on the relationship in question, but can include:
| Audience | Examples of contractual commitments |
|
Own workforce / human resources |
Policies and codes of conduct can establish enforceable (e.g. through disciplinary procedures) and transparent expectations in relation to human rights, workplace conduct, and treatment of customers (e.g. sexual harassment, non-discrimination, privacy and data protection). |
|
Contracted workforce Service providers Goods / materials supply chain Commercial partners |
Contracts with third party contractors, suppliers, and partners can integrate clear and enforceable human rights standards, including monitoring and reporting requirements (see also section on ‘Monitoring‘). This is particularly relevant where third-party staff are likely to encounter high-risk scenarios (such as third-party security providers in bank locations) or likely to engage vulnerable workers (such as in ancillary services such as cleaning or catering). These standards are frequently linked to policy commitments, such as procurement codes, supplier codes of conduct, or contractor management policies. |
Further reading
- Responsible Contracting Project (RCP)The Responsible Contracting Project ToolkitThe Responsible Contracting Project Toolkit provides contracting templates aligned with the UNGPs and the OECD MNE Guidelines